Skip to content

Conversation

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

Description

IntelliJ suggests new syntax for debugging with JDK 9 or later. The change makes easier to not manually change every time debugging.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

IntelliJ suggests new syntax for debugging with JDK 9 or later

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 4.00%. Comparing base (35a7438) to head (663a9ee).
Report is 9 commits behind head on 4.20.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (35a7438) and HEAD (663a9ee). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (35a7438) HEAD (663a9ee)
unittests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #10552       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     16.00%    4.00%   -12.01%     
=============================================
  Files          5651      397     -5254     
  Lines        495841    32487   -463354     
  Branches      60044     5760    -54284     
=============================================
- Hits          79370     1301    -78069     
+ Misses       407608    31037   -376571     
+ Partials       8863      149     -8714     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant