cleanup call on super in affinity groups projects component test

[DaanHoogland]

Description

This PR deals with a cleanup issue on the affinity groups create test-suite.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.17%. Comparing base (ea32a1a) to head (e98cbc3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 4.19.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              4.19   #10807       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     4.28%   15.17%   +10.88%     
- Complexity       0    11347    +11347     
============================================
  Files          371     5414     +5043     
  Lines        29700   475278   +445578     
  Branches      5211    57997    +52786     
============================================
+ Hits          1274    72141    +70867     
- Misses       28281   395069   +366788     
- Partials       145     8068     +7923     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.28% <ø> (ø)
unittests	15.90% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DaanHoogland]

@weizhouapache , @Pearl1594 , another GHA test fix. Can you review?

[Pearl1594]

code lgtm

[rohityadavcloud]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13311

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud