Skip to content

Proxmox Extension : Make settings such as storage, disk_size,... #12174

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2025
Merged

Proxmox Extension : Make settings such as storage, disk_size,... #12174

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2025
+8 −2

Conversation

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator

@abh1sar abh1sar commented Dec 2, 2025

Description

... iso_os_type configurable in the Proxmox extension

Doc PR: apache/cloudstack-documentation#601

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Using Template:
Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 11 16 52 AM
Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 11 18 58 AM

Using ISO:
Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 11 18 40 AM
Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 11 19 05 AM

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@abh1sar abh1sar requested a review from shwstppr December 2, 2025 08:37
@weizhouapache weizhouapache linked an issue Dec 2, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
CloudStack always uses local-lvm on Proxmox instead of shared storage #12163
Closed
@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

weizhouapache commented Dec 2, 2025

@Asadsid121
this should fix #12163, can you test it ?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.56%. Comparing base (21d844b) to head (3918f61).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on 4.22.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.22   #12174   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.56%   17.56%           
- Complexity    15539    15547    +8     
=========================================
  Files          5909     5910    +1     
  Lines        529097   529128   +31     
  Branches      64624    64636   +12     
=========================================
+ Hits          92913    92941   +28     
- Misses       425729   425730    +1     
- Partials      10455    10457    +2
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.58% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 18.63% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Asadsid121
Copy link

Asadsid121 commented Dec 2, 2025

@Asadsid121 this should fix #12163, can you test it ?

Yes, I have tested it and its working.

DaanHoogland
DaanHoogland approved these changes Dec 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

abh1sar commented Dec 3, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

blueorangutan commented Dec 3, 2025

@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

blueorangutan commented Dec 3, 2025

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15898

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland added this to the 4.22.1 milestone Dec 3, 2025
shwstppr
shwstppr approved these changes Dec 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code lgtm

@shwstppr shwstppr merged commit 4379666 into apache:4.22 Dec 3, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland deleted the proxmox-storage branch December 3, 2025 11:35
@shwstppr shwstppr mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@shwstppr shwstppr shwstppr approved these changes

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland DaanHoogland approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.22.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CloudStack always uses local-lvm on Proxmox instead of shared storage

6 participants

@abh1sar @weizhouapache @Asadsid121 @blueorangutan @shwstppr @DaanHoogland