Skip to content

Conversation

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

@andygrove andygrove commented Sep 10, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of #2019

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@andygrove andygrove marked this pull request as draft September 10, 2025 22:16
Copy link
Contributor

@parthchandra parthchandra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.43%. Comparing base (f09f8af) to head (98fcc3e).
⚠️ Report is 494 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2377      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     56.12%   57.43%   +1.30%     
- Complexity      976     1296     +320     
============================================
  Files           119      147      +28     
  Lines         11743    13405    +1662     
  Branches       2251     2346      +95     
============================================
+ Hits           6591     7699    +1108     
- Misses         4012     4443     +431     
- Partials       1140     1263     +123     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andygrove andygrove marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2025 22:37
exprBuilder.setListVal(listLiteralBuilder.build())
exprBuilder.setDatatype(serializeDataType(dataType).get)
case dt =>
logWarning(s"Unexpected datatype '$dt' for literal value '$value'")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be better to throw an exception here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think so. Thanks, I will update this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated this code to tag the plan with the warning and fall back to Spark

@comphead
Copy link
Contributor

Some compilation errors?

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 1553caa into apache:main Sep 11, 2025
94 checks passed
@andygrove andygrove deleted the refactor-literal-serde branch September 11, 2025 22:49
coderfender pushed a commit to coderfender/datafusion-comet that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants