Skip to content

Conversation

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

@andygrove andygrove commented Sep 30, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

Preparing for 0.10.1-rc1

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Bump Maven and Crate versions
  • Run cargo update

How are these changes tested?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (branch-0.10@63fd9ac). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-0.10    #2508   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   57.88%           
  Complexity             ?     1401           
==============================================
  Files                  ?      147           
  Lines                  ?    13501           
  Branches               ?     2378           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     7815           
  Misses                 ?     4449           
  Partials               ?     1237           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@parthchandra parthchandra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't there a iceberg 1.9.1 diff in the 0.10 branch?
Otherwise, lgtm.

@andygrove
Copy link
Member Author

Isn't there a iceberg 1.9.1 diff in the 0.10 branch? Otherwise, lgtm.

There is not ... we will need to backport that as well before creating the release. Thanks for spotting that.

@andygrove andygrove merged commit e5e6e5c into apache:branch-0.10 Sep 30, 2025
100 of 101 checks passed
@andygrove andygrove deleted the set-version-0.10.1 branch September 30, 2025 23:27
@parthchandra
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't there a iceberg 1.9.1 diff in the 0.10 branch? Otherwise, lgtm.

There is not ... we will need to backport that as well before creating the release. Thanks for spotting that.

We don't need that to hold up this release since it is a bug fix only release. If there are any issues found with Iceberg 1.9.1 or newer as part of the Iceberg integration, we can address those in 0.11.0, I feel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants