docs: Add documentation for supported window expressions #2696
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
comphead
reviewed
Nov 6, 2025
| | VarianceSamp | | Yes | | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Window Functions | ||
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@andygrove I'm preparing set of tests today to get real status for windows, let me get back to this PR later today
mbutrovich
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2025
Contributor
mbutrovich
left a comment
mbutrovich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but let's see what @comphead comes up with for their evaluation today.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
Rationale for this change
We had no documentation for supported window expressions.
What changes are included in this PR?
Added documentation for supported window expressions.
How are these changes tested?