- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 133
 
Use OnceLock to store TokioRuntime #895
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
            Michael-J-Ward
  merged 8 commits into
  apache:main
from
Michael-J-Ward:static-tokio-runtime
  
      
      
   
  Oct 5, 2024 
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            8 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      2dec05e
              
                bump rust-version to match upstream datafusion
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward 2934dac
              
                use std::sync::OnceLock to store tokio runtime instead of round-tripp…
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward 4c34718
              
                stop exporting TokioRuntime to python
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward cafd59e
              
                remove unused argument from get_tokio_runtime
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward 85f3ca3
              
                remove superflous Arc from get_tokio_runtime
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward d2dbc25
              
                add #[inline] annotation to get_tokio_runtime
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward 76dc0e2
              
                fix clippy lint
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward f99152e
              
                cargo fmt
              
              
                Michael-J-Ward File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So now it use
OnceLock<Runtime>thanOnceLock<Arc<Runtime>>to get rid of Python heap thoroughly. And it will not be thread-safe?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I recommend looking at the PR diff to see the real change.
There is an intermediate commit that went from
OnceLock<Arc<Runtime>>toOnceLock<Runtime>, but that's because theArcwas superfluous.OnceLockis alreadySend + Syncand explicitly thread-safe.So, if you discover that it is not actually thread-safe, please share!