Skip to content

Conversation

@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick from #59570

…apache#59570)

Ordered data compaction should not be used to accelerate the merging of
rowsets that have undergone a light schema change; otherwise, it may
result in schema-inconsistent segments within the newly generated
rowset.

None

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@doris-robot
Copy link

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 81.82% (9/11) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 53.29% (18679/35054)
Line Coverage 39.06% (172761/442249)
Region Coverage 33.79% (133712/395750)
Branch Coverage 34.77% (57838/166341)

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit d1ebe95 into apache:branch-4.0 Jan 8, 2026
23 of 25 checks passed
@zhiqiang-hhhh zhiqiang-hhhh deleted the pick_59570_to_upstream_branch-4.0 branch January 8, 2026 02:01
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants