Skip to content

branch-4.0: [test](mtmv) Add ut test for session variable guard when generate mtmv cache #58863 #59635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2026
Merged

branch-4.0: [test](mtmv) Add ut test for session variable guard when generate mtmv cache #58863 #59635

yiguolei merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2026

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Cherry-picked from #58863

@seawinde
[test](mtmv) Add ut test for session variable guard when generate mt…
c87eb8e 
…mv cache (#58863)

mtmvCache is globally reused, and each query shares the same instance of
mtmvCache. When generating the cache, it should not include any
attributes that are specific to an individual query.
current code has no problem, just add some ut

Related PR: #58031
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner January 7, 2026 09:39
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Jan 7, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring closed this Jan 7, 2026
@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Jan 7, 2026
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Jan 7, 2026

run buildall

@yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

yiguolei commented Jan 8, 2026

skip buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jan 8, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 1daddb6 into branch-4.0 Jan 8, 2026
27 of 30 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-58863-branch-4.0 branch January 8, 2026 03:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei yiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@hello-stephen @yiguolei @dataroaring @seawinde