Skip to content

[Fix](Streamingjob) Fix the issue of synchronization failure under empty tables #59735

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
JNSimba merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2026
Merged

[Fix](Streamingjob) Fix the issue of synchronization failure under empty tables #59735

JNSimba merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2026

Conversation

@JNSimba
Copy link
Member

@JNSimba JNSimba commented Jan 9, 2026

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #58898

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Jan 9, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 9, 2026

run buildall

dataroaring
dataroaring previously approved these changes Jan 10, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@dataroaring dataroaring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jan 10, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 10, 2026

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 10, 2026

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jan 12, 2026
@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 12, 2026

run buildall

@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 12, 2026

run cloud_p0

@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 12, 2026

run p0

2 similar comments
@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 12, 2026

run p0

@JNSimba
Copy link
Member Author

JNSimba commented Jan 12, 2026

run p0

sollhui
sollhui approved these changes Jan 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sollhui sollhui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jan 12, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@JNSimba JNSimba merged commit 7919f2a into apache:master Jan 12, 2026
28 of 29 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
@JNSimba
[Fix](Streamingjob) Fix the issue of synchronization failure under em…
4b8a2ac 
…pty tables (#59735)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Fix the issue of synchronization failure under empty tables 
Related PR: #58898
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2026
Merged
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2026
@github-actions @JNSimba
branch-4.0: [Fix](Streamingjob) Fix the issue of synchronization fail…
a33cc78 
…ure under empty tables #59735 (#59790)

Cherry-picked from #59735

Co-authored-by: wudi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@CalvinKirs CalvinKirs CalvinKirs approved these changes

@dataroaring dataroaring dataroaring left review comments

+1 more reviewer

@sollhui sollhui sollhui approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/4.0.3-merged reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@JNSimba @hello-stephen @CalvinKirs @sollhui @dataroaring @yiguolei