[ISSUE #4825] Deprecate Webhook function of EventMesh Runtime(v1)#5153
Merged
mxsm merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Jan 7, 2025
Merged
[ISSUE #4825] Deprecate Webhook function of EventMesh Runtime(v1)#5153mxsm merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
mxsm merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
xwm1992
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
xuhongjia
pushed a commit
to Deckers-Ohana/eventmesh
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4825
Motivation
Please see #4825. This PR is the final step to complete the issue, which contains a detailed historical background and a thorough analysis of the pros and cons. It has also been acknowledged in past bi-weekly meetings.
Modifications
Remove webhook processors/handlers in EventMesh runtime server, except
GrpcType.WEBHOOK, because it is not related to the feature mentioned in this issue.Documentation