Skip to content

Conversation

@kitalkuyo-gita
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Related to issue-367

How was this PR tested?

  • Tests have Added for the changes
  • Production environment verified

@SeasonPilot
Copy link
Contributor

Missing Parser Grammar modifications. The PostfixRowOperator() rule in the current Parser.jj does not support dynamic operator lookup.

@kitalkuyo-gita
Copy link
Contributor Author

kitalkuyo-gita commented Nov 19, 2025

Missing Parser Grammar modifications. The PostfixRowOperator() rule in the current Parser.jj does not support dynamic operator lookup.

As a UDF used for function calls, no keyword modification is required

@SeasonPilot You can refer to this PR; I didn't change any keywords, and it still passed CI.

@SeasonPilot
Copy link
Contributor

Missing Parser Grammar modifications. The PostfixRowOperator() rule in the current Parser.jj does not support dynamic operator lookup.缺少解析器语法修改。当前 Parser.jj 中的 PostfixRowOperator()规则不支持动态操作符查找。

As a UDF used for function calls, no keyword modification is required作为用于函数调用的 UDF,无需修改关键字

@SeasonPilot You can refer to this PR; I didn't change any keywords, and it still passed CI.你可以参考这个;我没有修改任何关键词,它仍然通过了 CI。

OK, I understand that the current PR lacks support for infix syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants