Skip to content

Conversation

@JinwooHwang
Copy link
Contributor

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically develop)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

  • Does gradlew build run cleanly?

  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?

  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?

@sboorlagadda sboorlagadda self-requested a review May 8, 2025 13:02
Copy link
Member

@sboorlagadda sboorlagadda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JinwooHwang-SAS Approving this as its version upgrade.

@JinwooHwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would you please let me know what needs to be done for this to move forward? Thanks.

@semioticrobotic
Copy link
Contributor

@niallkp: As per mailing list discussion, any chance you're able to review this?

@scmbuildguy
Copy link

Hi @JinwooHwang-SAS , looks like some failing required checks. Can you verify/rerun them?

@JinwooHwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @scmbuildguy , Could you please help me understand the error, Error: Cache service responded with 422? I don't see any issues with the changes that I have made. Thanks.

@JinwooHwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niallkp and @scmbuildguy, I would appreciate it if you could kindly provide your response at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Aug 27, 2025

closing/reopening to re-run the checks since the logs have been garbage-collected

@raboof raboof closed this Aug 27, 2025
@raboof raboof reopened this Aug 27, 2025
@JinwooHwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you very much @raboof . The checks are starting.

Copy link
Member

@raboof raboof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that the main branch is green after #7916 I'm confident any regressions caused by the update will be noticed, so this LGTM.

@raboof raboof merged commit dbbc91f into apache:develop Aug 28, 2025
34 of 49 checks passed
JinwooHwang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants