Skip to content

Conversation

@wgtmac
Copy link
Member

@wgtmac wgtmac commented Aug 9, 2025

No description provided.

@wgtmac wgtmac force-pushed the project_parquet_data branch from 370f1f4 to 99e4a73 Compare August 13, 2025 12:56
@wgtmac wgtmac marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2025 12:56
@wgtmac wgtmac force-pushed the project_parquet_data branch from 99e4a73 to 3cd3f75 Compare August 13, 2025 13:01
@wgtmac wgtmac force-pushed the project_parquet_data branch from 3cd3f75 to 9fbe44e Compare August 13, 2025 14:24
@wgtmac wgtmac requested review from lidavidm and zhjwpku August 13, 2025 16:11
}

private:
// TODO(gangwu): make memory pool configurable
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still a todo?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have well-thought opinion here. ReaderOptions basically cannot expose any Arrow-related concept. Maybe we cannot avoid introducing a MemoryPool interface which is similar to FileIO whose default implementation is backed by Arrow.

@wgtmac
Copy link
Member Author

wgtmac commented Aug 17, 2025

@Fokko @zeroshade Could you help review this? Thanks!

@zeroshade zeroshade merged commit 687ca03 into apache:main Aug 18, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants