Skip to content

Conversation

litiliu
Copy link
Contributor

@litiliu litiliu commented Aug 8, 2025

Purpose of this pull request

close #9682

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

Check list

@litiliu litiliu changed the title [Fix][E2E]unify the version of okhttp [Fix][Core]unify the version of okhttp Aug 12, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 12, 2025
@litiliu litiliu force-pushed the fix-9682 branch 4 times, most recently from eadedbf to 870ae05 Compare August 13, 2025 11:56
@litiliu litiliu marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2025 06:47
@litiliu litiliu marked this pull request as draft August 15, 2025 08:05
@litiliu litiliu changed the title [Fix][Core]unify the version of okhttp [Improve][Core]update okhttp version to 4.12 Aug 25, 2025
@litiliu litiliu changed the title [Improve][Core]update okhttp version to 4.12 [Improve][Core]update okhttp to 4.12.0 Aug 25, 2025
@litiliu litiliu marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2025 08:15
Comment on lines 50 to 55
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.squareup.okhttp</groupId>
<artifactId>okhttp</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit worried that this will cause potential anomalies in the hadoop uber jar.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@litiliu litiliu Aug 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the support of okhttp 4.9.* only start from hadoop 3.4.0, 3.3.4 , the previous hadoop versions are using a pretty old version okhttp 2.7.5. see HDFS-16453

Would it be better to updating the hadoop version(3.1.4->3.4.1) and the okhttp(2.7.5->4.9) at the same PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Hisoka-X Could you please kindly give some advices here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about update the hadoop version first?

@litiliu litiliu closed this Aug 25, 2025
@litiliu litiliu reopened this Aug 25, 2025
@litiliu litiliu marked this pull request as draft August 25, 2025 10:05
@github-actions github-actions bot removed core SeaTunnel core module connectors-v2 druid labels Aug 25, 2025
@litiliu litiliu closed this Aug 26, 2025
@litiliu litiliu reopened this Aug 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Zeta label Aug 26, 2025
@litiliu litiliu changed the title [Improve][Core]update okhttp to 4.12.0 [Bug][Core]fix kotlin jar conflict Aug 26, 2025
@litiliu litiliu marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2025 04:25
@litiliu
Copy link
Contributor Author

litiliu commented Aug 28, 2025

@Hisoka-X Could you please review? Thanks!

@litiliu litiliu changed the title [Bug][Core]fix kotlin jar conflict [Fix][Core]fix kotlin jar conflict Aug 28, 2025
@corgy-w corgy-w merged commit c4ec5c0 into apache:dev Aug 29, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] [E2E] NoSuchFieldError: Companion
3 participants