[SPARK-52196] Promote SparkSQLRepl code to Spark SQL REPL example
#160
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
force-pushed
the
SPARK-52196
branch
from
32cc638 to
27924a5
Compare
|
Could you review this PR when you have some time, @viirya ? |
viirya
reviewed
May 16, 2025
viirya
approved these changes
May 16, 2025
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <[email protected]>
|
Thank you, @viirya ! |
|
Merged to main. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to refactor the existing
SparkSQLReplcode toSpark SQL REPLexample like the other examples.Why are the changes needed?
For consistency.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No behavior change in the
SparkConnectlibrary code.How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs and manual review.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.