[SPARK-51863] Support join and crossJoin in DataFrame
#80
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Let me merge this to unblock the next dev steps. |
peter-toth
reviewed
Apr 22, 2025
| /// - right: Right side of the join operation. | ||
| /// - usingColumn: Name of the column to join on. This column must exist on both sides. | ||
| /// - joinType: Type of join to perform. Default `inner`. | ||
| /// - Returns: <#description#> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
#description# is some kind of placeholder?
peter-toth
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2025
|
Thank you for review, @peter-toth .
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to support
joinandcrossJoininDataFrame.Why are the changes needed?
For feature parity.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.