[SPARK-52602] Document all public classes #258
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
force-pushed
the
SPARK-52602
branch
2 times, most recently
from
76423ec to
c3d0895
Compare
dongjoon-hyun
force-pushed
the
SPARK-52602
branch
from
c3d0895 to
3aeaf37
Compare
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Jun 28, 2025
Member
Author
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a doc-only change, let me merge this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add a Javadoc to all public classes.
Why are the changes needed?
To provide a proper documentation.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No behavior change because this is a Javadoc only change.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.