[SPARK-52654] Use ParallelGC by default
#270
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
Could you review this PR too, @peter-toth ? |
peter-toth
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2025
Contributor
peter-toth
left a comment
peter-toth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure. It looks good to me.
Member
Author
|
Thank you so much, @peter-toth . |
Member
Author
|
Merged to main. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to use
ParallelGCby default.Why are the changes needed?
Since
Spark K8s Operatoris not interactive application, we had better useParallelGCbecause it is optimized for throughput in general.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No behavior change.
How was this patch tested?
Manual review.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.