[SPARK-54910][SS] Add sourceIdentifyingName parameter to StreamingRelationV2 #53704
+30
−7
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the
sourceIdentifyingNameparameter toStreamingRelationV2and introduces theHasStreamingSourceIdentifyingNametrait to provide a uniform interface for streaming source naming.Key changes:
HasStreamingSourceIdentifyingNametrait inStreamingSourceIdentifyingName.scalasourceIdentifyingNameparameter toStreamingRelationV2case class with default valueUnassignedwithSourceIdentifyingNamemethod to support name propagationStreamingRelationV2in sql/core to account for new parameterWhy are the changes needed?
This change lays the groundwork for streaming source evolution by enabling sources to have stable identifying names. The parameter will be used by analyzer rules to assign and propagate names from DataFrame API calls, allowing sources to maintain their checkpoint state even when sources are added, removed, or reordered in a query.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. The parameter is added with a default value (
Unassigned) that maintains backward compatibility. No user-facing APIs are modified.How was this patch tested?
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.