Skip to content

Conversation

@tobice
Copy link
Contributor

@tobice tobice commented Nov 21, 2025

I randomly noticed this.

  • I think referencing the constant directly could be confusing, so I added an import.
  • The ** were presumably supposed to make the param bold but it did not work 😄
image

Note

Polishes the limited-permissions examples by adding the missing constant import and fixing the API query parameter formatting.

  • Docs (migration guide):
    • Apify Client example: Adds explicit import { ACTOR_PERMISSION_LEVEL } from '@apify/consts' for forcePermissionLevel usage.
    • API example: Fixes POST /v2/acts/<actor_id>/runs?forcePermissionLevel=LIMITED_PERMISSIONS formatting by removing incorrect bold markup.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 05ac2dc. Configure here.

@tobice tobice requested review from raethlo and stepskop November 21, 2025 14:32
@tobice tobice self-assigned this Nov 21, 2025
@tobice tobice requested a review from TC-MO as a code owner November 21, 2025 14:32
@tobice tobice added the adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. label Nov 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-core-services Issues with this label are in the ownership of the core services team. label Nov 21, 2025
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 05ac2dc and is ready at https://pr-2103.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Contributor

@raethlo raethlo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :shipit:

@raethlo raethlo merged commit 6d0e6cb into master Nov 21, 2025
13 checks passed
@raethlo raethlo deleted the tobik/docs/fix-force-permission-level-example branch November 21, 2025 17:21
@raethlo raethlo added the validated Issues that are resolved and their solutions fulfill the acceptance criteria. label Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-core-services Issues with this label are in the ownership of the core services team. validated Issues that are resolved and their solutions fulfill the acceptance criteria.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants