Skip to content

chore: Disable test_actor_on_platform_max_request_retries #541

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025
Merged

chore: Disable test_actor_on_platform_max_request_retries #541

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025

Conversation

Pijukatel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Pijukatel Pijukatel added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Aug 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 121st sprint - Tooling team milestone Aug 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics. label Aug 11, 2025
@Pijukatel Pijukatel requested a review from vdusek August 11, 2025 13:06
vdusek
vdusek approved these changes Aug 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Pijukatel Pijukatel marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2025 13:30
@Pijukatel Pijukatel merged commit 437648a into master Aug 11, 2025
23 checks passed
@Pijukatel Pijukatel deleted the disable-max-retries-test branch August 11, 2025 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vdusek vdusek vdusek approved these changes

Assignees

@Pijukatel Pijukatel

Labels
t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
121st sprint - Tooling team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Pijukatel @vdusek