-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
feat(input_schema): Enable secret objects #515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
452cf6f
feat(input_schema): Enable secret objects
mfori 8a7721e
use the agreed approach with schema hash
mfori 719a596
add input_secrets dependency to input_schema package
mfori c31246f
Merge branch 'master' into feat/secret-object-input
mfori 980f516
add input_secrets dependency to input_schema package
mfori 9e6908a
cleanup
mfori 3e87a9d
fix tests
mfori d97c264
enable prefill for secret inputs
mfori fc46b61
address CR
mfori b8ceb1e
fix tests
mfori 460297e
use hex for hash, fix fieldtype condition
mfori fabbaa8
remove validation properties form secret string
mfori 516ae21
address CR
mfori 6e62f98
omit prefill from field schema hash
mfori 667fb2e
Merge branch 'master' into feat/secret-object-input
mfori 0107b23
merge develop and npm install
mfori File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can now validate these for
secret
strings too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not 100% sure here - wouldn't we end up applying the validation to the encrypted value in this case? (That would not be useful)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I removed these three properties for now. We can add it later but would need to catch the Ajv errors