Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.1 #382

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 31, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.3.0 -> 29.3.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.3.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: allow isolatedModules mode to have ts.Program under Node16/Next (25157eb)
  • fix: improve message for isolatedModules of ts-jest config (547eb6f)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 31, 2025 19:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch from a6a9515 to ad60271 Compare April 1, 2025 12:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch from ad60271 to dc8e26d Compare April 2, 2025 21:42
@renovate renovate bot merged commit c3abba3 into main Apr 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch April 4, 2025 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant