Skip to content

Conversation

mialeska
Copy link
Contributor

@mialeska mialeska commented Jul 8, 2025

No description provided.

@mialeska mialeska self-assigned this Jul 8, 2025
@mialeska mialeska added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 8, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates include modifications to the CI pipeline and project dependencies, as well as test adjustments. The pipeline now uses Android SDK API 30, explicitly installs Java 8 with Homebrew, adds verbose logging to the emulator, implements a bounded emulator readiness check, and installs Appium version 2 explicitly. The Maven dependencies were updated to newer versions. Test logic was modified to swap focus between radio buttons and the URL for a web radio button test was changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
azure-pipelines.yml Upgraded Android SDK to API 30 (x86_64), installed Java 8 via Homebrew with JAVA_HOME set, added verbose flag to emulator, improved emulator readiness check with timeout, switched Appium install to version 2.
pom.xml Updated dependency versions: aquality-selenium-core (4.0.3 → 4.6.0), io.appium:java-client (9.2.3 → 9.5.0), commons-lang3 (3.14.0 → 3.17.0), commons-io (2.16.1 → 2.19.0).
src/test/java/samples/android/ITestRadioButton.java Swapped test focus from first to second radio button in testRadioButton method; assertion and click sequence reversed accordingly.
src/test/java/samples/android/web/WebRadioButtonTest.java Changed URL in openRadioButtonsScreen method from "http://www.echoecho.com/htmlforms10.htm" to "https://formy-project.herokuapp.com/radiobutton".

Poem

A hop and a skip, new versions in tow,
Android thirty now runs the show.
Java eight’s installed with care,
Appium’s stable, bugs beware!
Libraries fresh, dependencies bright—
This bunny codes through the night!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be12180 and fdf8694.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • azure-pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • azure-pipelines.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests LOCAL_SERVER)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Analyse code with SonarQube)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests REMOTE_SERVER)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)

78-80: -verbose emulator switch floods logs – consider redirecting to a file

The added flag will stream tens of MBs per minute to the job log, making troubleshooting harder and slowing the UI. Recommend redirecting to emulator.log and uploading it only on failure.

-nohup $ANDROID_HOME/emulator/emulator -avd "$(ANDROID_EMU_NAME)" -gpu swiftshader_indirect -noaudio -no-boot-anim -no-snapshot -verbose > /dev/null 2>&1 &
+nohup $ANDROID_HOME/emulator/emulator -avd "$(ANDROID_EMU_NAME)" -gpu swiftshader_indirect -noaudio -no-boot-anim -no-snapshot -verbose > emulator.log 2>&1 &
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b83944 and d3933bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • azure-pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
  • pom.xml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests LOCAL_SERVER)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Analyse code with SonarQube)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests REMOTE_SERVER)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pom.xml (2)

188-199: Cross-check transitive Selenium version after upgrading core & Appium client

aquality-selenium-core:4.6.0 and java-client:9.5.0 both bring their own Selenium dependencies.
If your intention is to land on Selenium 4.33.0 (per PR title) you should explicitly pin it under <dependencyManagement>; otherwise Maven may keep whatever version is required by the two libs (historically < 4.20), yielding a runtime “NoSuchMethodError” cocktail.

Example pin-in-BOM:

<dependencyManagement>
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.seleniumhq.selenium</groupId>
            <artifactId>selenium-java</artifactId>
            <version>4.33.0</version>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>

Please verify with mvn dependency:tree that the resolved Selenium version is the one you expect.


208-219: Validate that the new Lang 3 / IO versions exist on Maven Central

commons-lang3:3.17.0 and commons-io:2.19.0 are ahead of the latest GA versions I’m aware of (3.14 / 2.16). Builds will 404 if these artifacts have not yet been published. Double-check on search.maven.org before merging or pin to the latest available releases.

azure-pipelines.yml (1)

64-67: JAVA 8 install is local to this script only – confirm Maven still compiles with JDK 11

Environment variables exported inside the CmdLine@2 step do not survive into later tasks.
Given that the subsequent Maven steps explicitly request JDK 11 this is probably fine, but please sanity-check that:

  1. Appium/emulator really need 1.8 (many tools are OK with 11 +).
  2. The mixed toolchain doesn’t surface when running tests that spawn adb/Appium from Java code.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Review in progress in Aquality Appium Mobile Jul 8, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)

93-93: Appium version pinning addresses previous review feedback.

The change from appium@next to appium@2 directly addresses the previous review comment about preventing spontaneous pipeline breakages. This ensures build stability while allowing minor/patch updates within the major version.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3933bb and be12180.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • azure-pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
  • src/test/java/samples/android/ITestRadioButton.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/samples/android/web/WebRadioButtonTest.java (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/test/java/samples/android/web/WebRadioButtonTest.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests LOCAL_SERVER)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Analyse code with SonarQube)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-appium-mobile-java (Run tests REMOTE_SERVER)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
azure-pipelines.yml (3)

56-56: Good upgrade to Android API 30 with x86_64 architecture.

The upgrade from API 28 to API 30 and the switch to x86_64 architecture addresses the previous review feedback about avoiding Rosetta translation on Apple Silicon hosts. This should improve emulator performance and stability.


64-66: Explicit Java 8 installation improves build reproducibility.

Adding explicit Java 8 installation via Homebrew and proper environment variable configuration ensures consistent Java version across different macOS agents, which is essential for compatibility with the updated Appium and Selenium versions.


79-79: Verbose logging will help with emulator troubleshooting.

The addition of the -verbose flag to the emulator startup command will provide more detailed logs for debugging emulator issues, which is valuable for CI/CD troubleshooting.

src/test/java/samples/android/ITestRadioButton.java (1)

14-20: Test logic change maintains coverage while improving clarity.

The modification to focus on the second radio button instead of the first maintains the same test coverage for radio button mutual exclusivity. The test sequence correctly verifies:

  1. Initial unchecked state of button2
  2. Checked state after clicking button2
  3. Unchecked state after clicking button1 (mutual exclusivity)

The test logic is sound and provides clear validation of radio button behavior.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 8, 2025

@mialeska mialeska merged commit 1c752cb into master Jul 8, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review in progress to Done in Aquality Appium Mobile Jul 8, 2025
@mialeska mialeska deleted the support/update-to-appium-9.5.0 branch July 8, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant