feat: Enable caching tokens for multiple vault namespaces

[DaThumpingRabbit]

Description

As mentioned in this comment #660 (comment), the token caching strategy currently does not include support for multiple namespaces when using Vault Enterprise

Right now, it is configured to use different files per auth method and per identifier when possible (roleID for approles, username for user/pass)
With this PR, it will also include the name of the namespacxe when provided, and use default when not

Checklist

Please make sure that your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• Reviewed the guidelines for contributing to this repository
• The commit message follows the Conventional Commits Guidelines.
• Tests for the changes have been updated
• Are you adding dependencies? If so, please run go mod tidy -compat=1.22.7 to ensure only the minimum is pulled in.
• Docs have been added / updated
• Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.

Type of Change

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• New tests
• Build/CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other (please describe)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.58%. Comparing base (42a43f0) to head (d2907ea).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/auth/vault/userpass.go	75.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #695      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.16%   71.58%   -0.59%     
==========================================
  Files          26       29       +3     
  Lines        1994     2611     +617     
==========================================
+ Hits         1439     1869     +430     
- Misses        458      590     +132     
- Partials       97      152      +55     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DaThumpingRabbit]

@werne2j @jkayani
Could you please have a look at this PR ? It should be included in the same release as #660 if possible since both are improving the same feature

[DaThumpingRabbit]

@werne2j @jkayani
Are you still the ones maintaining that repository ?
I would like to know if this feature will be merged or not because it is still causing issues for some users
Thanks