Skip to content

fix: swallowed error in startMissingWatches #605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: swallowed error in startMissingWatches #605

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
29 changes: 16 additions & 13 deletions pkg/cache/cluster.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -492,21 +492,24 @@ func (c *clusterCache) startMissingWatches() error {

err := c.processApi(client, api, func(resClient dynamic.ResourceInterface, ns string) error {
resourceVersion, err := c.loadInitialState(ctx, api, resClient, ns, false) // don't lock here, we are already in a lock before startMissingWatches is called inside watchEvents
if err != nil && c.isRestrictedResource(err) {
keep := false
if c.respectRBAC == RespectRbacStrict {
k, permErr := c.checkPermission(ctx, clientset.AuthorizationV1().SelfSubjectAccessReviews(), api)
if permErr != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to check permissions for resource %s: %w, original error=%v", api.GroupKind.String(), permErr, err.Error())
if err != nil {
if c.isRestrictedResource(err) {
keep := false
if c.respectRBAC == RespectRbacStrict {
k, permErr := c.checkPermission(ctx, clientset.AuthorizationV1().SelfSubjectAccessReviews(), api)
if permErr != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to check permissions for resource %s: %w, original error=%v", api.GroupKind.String(), permErr, err.Error())
}
keep = k
}
// if we are not allowed to list the resource, remove it from the watch list
if !keep {
delete(c.apisMeta, api.GroupKind)
delete(namespacedResources, api.GroupKind)
return nil
}
keep = k
}
// if we are not allowed to list the resource, remove it from the watch list
if !keep {
delete(c.apisMeta, api.GroupKind)
delete(namespacedResources, api.GroupKind)
return nil
}
return fmt.Errorf("failed to start watch %s: %w", api.GroupKind.String(), err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be wrapped in an else to avoid throwing an error when the resource is just restricted?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont think it makes sense to call c.watchEvents if resourceVersion is nil and there is an error.

If keep is true, that means the resource is restricted (k8sErrors.IsForbidden(err) || k8sErrors.IsUnauthorized(err)), but the controller has permissions... it sounds like it should never happens.

And there is another codepath here that has a a different logic, so I think both should be the same. @gdsoumya can you give more insights on what should be happening.

gitops-engine/pkg/cache/cluster.go

Lines 870 to 871 in b04ee04

if err != nil {
if c.isRestrictedResource(err) {

}
go c.watchEvents(ctx, api, resClient, ns, resourceVersion)
return nil
Expand Down