Skip to content

update tiebreak language #587

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
artoonie merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2025
Merged

update tiebreak language #587

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion visualizer/descriptors/faq.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ def get_answer(self, roundNum):
rnd = self.summary.rounds[roundNum]

result = "The tiebreak method is up to the election administrator. "\
"RCVis does not know what method was chosen to break this tie, only that "
"The outcome of the tiebreak is that "

parts = []

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions visualizer/tests/testFaq.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ def test_tiebreak(self):
self.assertEqual(
faq.HowWereTiesBroken(*args).get_answer(1),
"The tiebreak method is up to the election administrator. "
"RCVis does not know what method was chosen to break this tie, "
"only that Yinka Dare was eliminated and George Gervin was was elected.")
"The outcome of the tiebreak is that Yinka Dare was eliminated "
"and George Gervin was was elected.")
self.assertTrue(faq.WhyEliminated(*args).get_answer(1).startswith("There was a tie"))
self.assertTrue(faq.WhySingleWinner(*args).get_answer(1).startswith("There was a tie"))
Loading