⚡️ Speed up function retrieve_timesteps by 78%
#138
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 78% (0.78x) speedup for
retrieve_timestepsinsrc/diffusers/pipelines/hidream_image/pipeline_hidream_image.py⏱️ Runtime :
745 microseconds→418 microseconds(best of308runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here’s a rewritten, optimized version of your function.
The optimization targets the expensive repeated use of
inspect.signature()(which is very slow).Instead, we cache the parameter introspection on the scheduler’s type, so it's only done once per class.
Below is the code, with all existing comments preserved and only improved for the code that changes.
Optimization summary:
inspect.signature(...).parameters.keys()calls (previously measured as a major bottleneck) are now done once per scheduler class.This will substantially reduce per-call CPU time, especially when calling this function in a loop or across many batches.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-retrieve_timesteps-mbdqa6x5and push.