Fix broken link

[jeradrutnam]

This pull request updates the documentation link in the README.md file to point to the latest "Getting Started" guide for Thunder. This ensures that users are directed to the most up-to-date onboarding material.

Documentation update:

• Updated the documentation link in README.md to reference the "What is Thunder" guide under the /next/guides/getting-started/ path.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated documentation link to point to the new getting-started guide.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 994e2f00-c07b-42ac-b6ba-b68bb590875c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a233ccf and 6bddd69.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated a documentation link in the README from the legacy introduction page to a new "what is Thunder" getting-started guide page. No code changes or structural modifications were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Link Update README.md	Updated the Documentation hyperlink URL from /docs/guides/introduction to /docs/next/guides/getting-started/what-is-thunder.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

skip-changelog

Suggested reviewers

• DonOmalVindula
• brionmario

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description lacks required template sections including Purpose (adequate but brief), Approach, and most of the Checklist items. While it explains the change, it does not follow the repository's template structure.	Complete the pull request description template by adding Purpose, Approach, Checklist items, and Security checks sections to align with repository requirements.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Fix broken link' is vague and generic. While it relates to the change (updating a documentation link), it lacks specificity about what link or why it needed fixing.	Use a more descriptive title such as 'Update documentation link to latest getting-started guide' to clearly convey the purpose of the change.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch jeradrutnam-patch-2

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

⚠️ Deprecation Warning: The deny-licenses option is deprecated for possible removal in the next major release. For more information, see issue 997.

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 6bddd69.

Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Files

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.51%. Comparing base (a233ccf) to head (6bddd69).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2256   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.51%   89.51%           
=======================================
  Files         911      911           
  Lines       60145    60145           
=======================================
  Hits        53839    53839           
  Misses       4686     4686           
  Partials     1620     1620           

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend-integration-postgres	53.37% <ø> (ø)
backend-integration-sqlite	53.37% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
backend-unit	83.95% <ø> (ø)
frontend-apps-console-unit	90.14% <ø> (ø)
frontend-apps-gate-unit	97.48% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.