Use gh release instead of someone's release action
#635
Conversation
The upstream action times out because it requests every release (without pagination), and there's no real need to use a third-party action for this when the `gh` command does a perfectly fine job too.
|
Meant to send this earlier - I am pretty sure this matches the behavior of the third-party action as we were using it. (I don't know whether we actually want the behavior of reusing a previous prerelease... given that you have to manually delete the tag anyway, it doesn't really make anything easier, and I kind of don't want assets uploaded that the most recent run wouldn't have uploaded.) I am not totally sure how to test this. I could some releases with 1980s version numbers and see what happens? I could make a detached fork in my account and try it out? Alternatively I'll likely do the next release and I can just make sure it does what I expect, if we're comfortable merging without testing. |
|
I'm fine with moving forward without testing for now. |
3 participants
The upstream action times out because it requests every release (without pagination), and there's no real need to use a third-party action for this when the
ghcommand does a perfectly fine job too.