Minor generalization of Telegram message sending code#184
Merged
JulienPeloton merged 1 commit intoastrolabsoftware:mainfrom May 16, 2025
Merged
Minor generalization of Telegram message sending code#184JulienPeloton merged 1 commit intoastrolabsoftware:mainfrom
JulienPeloton merged 1 commit intoastrolabsoftware:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks @karpov-sv !
good to know :-) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now it is able to send unlimited number of (secondary) images, that may be either PNGs or just image URLs (that works, surprisingly). Also, now it is possible to specify parse_mode - https://core.telegram.org/bots/api#formatting-options - e.g. to set it to MarkdownV2 that allows nesting some formatting, to get bold links etc (but then a lot of characters should be escaped in the text - and we have a function for that).
And the timeouts are configurable.
It should not break existing calls to this function, but I honestly did not check it