-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Added null check to some adapters and changed type definition #150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e20bba5
fix: add null check
ayame113 85cc505
fix: match type definition to specification
ayame113 1a31014
fix: use lsp package for type definition
ayame113 f2f09f0
fix: fixed test because the argument of _sendRequest function was cha…
ayame113 c9876c6
fix: format
ayame113 d665159
fix: lint(Missing return type on function)
ayame113 e7c26b4
fix: early null check instead of empty array at codeActio provider
ayame113 1f61f73
fix: "object is possibly 'null'.ts(2531)" in codeaction test
ayame113 ab4224e
chore: declare result with R type
aminya 88f1193
chore: keep getCodeActions null-safe
aminya a80e4d9
fix: make highlight null-safe
aminya 987d5bd
test: remove excess casting of actions
aminya b83344b
chore: do not convert boolean just to compare with null
aminya 304e100
chore: update prettier-config
aminya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to
codeAction
it returnsPromise<Array<lsp.Command | lsp.CodeAction>>
so a promise resolving tonull
orundefined
is an invalid return type and should probably throw an error (as it currently does) instead of being handled the same as an empty array. Or the return type should be updated to includenull
andundefined
as valid returns.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tend to prefer throwing a valid error instead of failing silently like this. @aminya This is what I was talking about in #132 (comment) when I said "types do not catch runtime errors".
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your review!
The spec seems to say that codeAction returns
(Command | CodeAction) [] | null
. Is it not necessary to raise an error if the language server returns valid null?By the way, such a change is also an option.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the early null check rather than still mapping over an empty array.
We should change the return type of codeAction if null is a valid response according to the spec.NVM I see you already did that. 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At e7c26b4, I changed it to return null instead of an empty array when
actions
value is null.