Skip to content

Conversation

JonathanOppenheimer
Copy link
Member

@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer commented Oct 15, 2025

Why this should be merged

This breaks up #1679

}

base64LeafsRequest := "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABpbSBST09UaW5nIGZvciB5YQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIFL9/AchgmVPFj9fD5piHXKVZsdNEAN8TXu7BAfR4sZJAAAAIIGFWthoHQ2G0ekeABZ5OctmlNLEIqzSCKAHKTlIf2mZBAA="
base64LeafsRequest := "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABpbSBST09UaW5nIGZvciB5YQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIFL9/AchgmVPFj9fD5piHXKVZsdNEAN8TXu7BAfR4sZJAAAAIIGFWthoHQ2G0ekeABZ5OctmlNLEIqzSCKAHKTlIf2mZBAAA"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you can add a test that the old serialization format can be decoded as well. I'm not sure we should make breaking changes to this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm? It's just the padding

Copy link
Contributor

@alarso16 alarso16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm still concerned about new nodes receiving an old format or old nodes receiving the new format and being unable to properly sync. If this concerned is deemed unimportant/fixed, then this looks good to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants