Creating a simpler version of Typescript static website hosting without Cloudfront, ACM and Route53 #1104
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a simpler example of S3-based static website hosting to the Typescript library. The existing static-site example requires creating a domain in Route53 via the console ahead of time, and creates several resources in the target account including Route53 Alias records, a CloudFront distribution, and an SSL cert in ACM.
This version is much simpler and demonstrates deploying static content to S3 with the appropriate permissions to serve that content.
Fixes #1018
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.