Skip to content

Bump jackson to 2.19.0#6354

Closed
RanVaknin wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
rvaknin/bump-jackson-version
Closed

Bump jackson to 2.19.0#6354
RanVaknin wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
rvaknin/bump-jackson-version

Conversation

@RanVaknin
Copy link
Contributor

Bumping Jackson dependencies to 2.19.0

@RanVaknin RanVaknin added the changelog-not-required Indicate changelog entry is not required for a specific PR label Aug 18, 2025
@RanVaknin RanVaknin requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 21:06
@RanVaknin RanVaknin added the no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required label Aug 18, 2025
*/
public static final JsonFactory DEFAULT_JSON_FACTORY =
JsonFactory.builder()
.enable(StreamReadFeature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jackson 2.16.0 introduced a behavior change where this behavior was true and now defaults to false. This caused our test to break.

In order to maintain the same behavior we have to manually enable this config.

more info FasterXML/jackson-core#1038

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@Fred1155 Fred1155 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Version change PR requires changelog

@RanVaknin RanVaknin removed the changelog-not-required Indicate changelog entry is not required for a specific PR label Aug 19, 2025
@RanVaknin RanVaknin force-pushed the rvaknin/bump-jackson-version branch from 5d6bca4 to c35006c Compare August 19, 2025 20:41
@RanVaknin RanVaknin closed this Sep 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants