chore: improve PR template

.crux_template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+## Description
+
+### Why is this change being made?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### What is changing?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### Related Links
+- **Ticket/Issue**: 
+- **Design Doc**: 
+
+---
+
+## Revision History
+
+<!-- Create a new entry in this section when publishing new revisions. Leave blank for Revision 1. -->
+
+### Revision X:
+
+#### What has changed since the last revision?
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Testing
+
+### How was this tested?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### When testing locally, provide testing artifact(s):
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Reviewee Checklist
+
+**Update the checklist on each revision:**
+
+- [ ] I have reviewed, tested and understand all changes
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have filled out the Description and Testing sections above
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated the Revision History section (if publishing a new revision)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Build and Unit tests are passing
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Unit test coverage for changes is adequate (> 80%)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated integration tests (if needed)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have ensured no sensitive information is leaking (i.e., no logging of sensitive fields, or otherwise)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have added explanatory comments for complex logic, new classes/methods and new tests
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated README/documentation (if needed)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have clearly called out breaking changes (if any)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+
+---
+
+## Reviewer Checklist
+
+**All reviewers please ensure the following are true before reviewing each revision:**
+
+- Reviewee checklist has been accurately filled out
+- Code changes align with stated purpose in description
+- Test coverage adequately validates the changes

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -1,6 +1,67 @@
-*Issue #, if available:*
+## Description
 
-*Description of changes:*
+### Why is this change being made?
 
+1.
+
+
+### What is changing?
+
+1.
+
+
+### Related Links
+- **Issue #, if available**:
+
+---
+
+## Testing
+
+### How was this tested?
+
+1. 
+
+### When testing locally, provide testing artifact(s):
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Reviewee Checklist
+
+**Update the checklist after submitting the PR**
+
+- [ ] I have reviewed, tested and understand all changes
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have filled out the Description and Testing sections above
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Build and Unit tests are passing
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Unit test coverage check is passing
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated integration tests (if needed)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have ensured no sensitive information is leaking (i.e., no logging of sensitive fields, or otherwise)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have added explanatory comments for complex logic, new classes/methods and new tests
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated README/documentation (if needed)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have clearly called out breaking changes (if any)
+  *If not, why:*
+
+---
+
+## Reviewer Checklist
+
+**All reviewers please ensure the following are true before reviewing:**
+
+- Reviewee checklist has been accurately filled out
+- Code changes align with stated purpose in description
+- Test coverage adequately validates the changes
+
+---
 
 By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.