Skip to content

Conversation

@12ya
Copy link
Contributor

@12ya 12ya commented Jan 2, 2026

efficient string construction

Does this change impact docs?

  • Yes, PR includes docs updates
  • Yes, issue opened: #
  • No

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@12ya 12ya requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2026 15:17
@12ya 12ya requested a review from engedaam January 2, 2026 15:17
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Preview deployment ready!

Preview URL: https://pr-8818.d18coufmbnnaag.amplifyapp.com

Built from commit 69fb8f7ce39a55f18d249bf1f7a00b88de94ac8d

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 2, 2026

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20678809604

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.008%) to 67.67%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20668987370: 0.008%
Covered Lines: 7843
Relevant Lines: 11590

💛 - Coveralls

@DerekFrank
Copy link
Contributor

Can you demonstrate that this does generates the strings properly after the change?

@12ya
Copy link
Contributor Author

12ya commented Jan 5, 2026

Can you demonstrate that this does generates the strings properly after the change?

I can add a unit test to verify this, but the only difference is performance - strings.Builder don't allocate a new string on each concatenation

@engedaam engedaam merged commit 7d53253 into aws:main Jan 10, 2026
15 checks passed
@12ya 12ya deleted the patch6 branch January 10, 2026 06:56
saurav-agarwalla pushed a commit to saurav-agarwalla/karpenter-provider-aws that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants