feat: relation revisions

[inchei]

typeID 写了一个缺省为 5，因为缺测试数据 subject

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.32479% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 57.34%. Comparing base (6a32bcf) to head (85f7f74).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
routes/private/routes/wiki/subject/index.ts	86.66%	6 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
routes/private/routes/wiki/character/index.ts	86.11%	4 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
routes/private/routes/wiki/person/index.ts	86.11%	4 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1471      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.23%   57.34%   +1.11%     
==========================================
  Files         142      142              
  Lines        6284     6518     +234     
  Branches     1298     1340      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits         3534     3738     +204     
- Misses       2135     2148      +13     
- Partials      615      632      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[everpcpc]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 266b96cde9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Use a unique schema id for person cast revisions

The PersonCastRevisionWikiInfo schema is registered with $id: 'CharacterCastRevisionWikiInfo', which collides with the character-cast schema. When both wiki route modules are registered (the normal server setup), this duplicate id means one schema overwrites the other, so either /characters/-/casts/revisions or /persons/-/casts/revisions will be validated and documented against the wrong shape. That can lead to response serialization dropping the actual character/person fields or throwing due to missing required fields, and the OpenAPI output will be inaccurate for at least one endpoint.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[trim21]

这个等我补上测试数据再说吧

[trim21]

这个缺的测试数据是啥，有没有SQL例子发一下（

[inchei]

这个缺的测试数据是啥，有没有SQL例子发一下（

snapshot 里那些 type 5 的都是，是这样吗

SELECT 
    s.*,
    sf.*
FROM chii_subjects s
LEFT JOIN chii_subject_fields sf 
    ON s.subject_id = sf.field_sid
WHERE s.subject_id IN (283, 292, 793, 993, 1263, 1428, 2089, 2129, 2425, 2427, 2474, 2782, 3018, 3183, 3625, 3690, 4124, 8474, 22267, 22273, 35866, 86773, 199229, 209563);

[trim21]

s.sql

导出了，你加到dev-env里面吧()