Customizations for typescript

[ThornWalli]

@MrTelanie I have now started testing the PR with the factory adjustment.

So far I can only do this in an external project, because build is required.

This is one point, others will certainly follow ;)

Argument 🤪 is missing when using the calc method

The idea is to solve this with an undefined on Result.

There is a lot of any. Could the calc not have a vector as result?

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/basics/vector/@js-basics/vector@546

commit: ebee175

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[ThornWalli]

@MrTelanie
How should you proceed with Calc?

Fixed return value, whereby it is then undetermined whether Victor or Vector.

When executing, there are different objects in any case, so you would have to use a generic?

This then returns a number 🙃
Is it because of the argument arg?

/**
 *
 * @template T
 * @param {() => T} alg
 * @param {T | (() => T)} [result]
 * @returns {T}
 */
export function operatorCalc<T>(alg: () => T, result?: T | (() => T)): T;

Victor + Vector = Vector

[MrTelanie]

@ThornWalli
if you need more specific types, take a look at jsdoc
like i did here
#545

[MrTelanie]

@ThornWalli

const vectorResult = calc(() => victorA + vectorA);

for ts the function looks like this in best case () => number
ts does not know what gets calculated here

i think in my impl the first type is used so victor + vector = victor and vector + victor = vector

thats why i think in ts you cant work with calc any more directly
you should switch to factory functions

const vectorResult = victor(() => victorA + vectorA);

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀