Skip to content

Conversation

@mark-thm
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2328.

In #2126, we discussed and added --no-build-isolation to ensure that sdist builds pulled from rules_python supplied dependencies. An unanticipated/misunderstood side-effect of this is that pip will no longer resolve necessary, declared build time dependencies from a package index. That's a significant point of friction for users, and, it's much harder to opt-out of the behavior than to opt-in given the presence of extra_pip_args.

@mark-thm mark-thm changed the title Remove --no-build-isolation from pip install command fix: Remove --no-build-isolation from pip install command Oct 30, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aignas aignas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@groodt groodt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

The move towards PEP-517 makes sense to me. It also aligns with recent changes to get-pip in python 3.12+ that don't install wheel or setuptools by default and will require packages to define their build time dependencies correctly. pypa/get-pip#200

@mark-thm
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased to resolve the conflict

@aignas aignas added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 31, 2024
Merged via the queue into bazel-contrib:main with commit b6fc2a0 Oct 31, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Not possible to use bottleneck as a dependency on linux arm64 with rules_python 0.37.0

3 participants