refactor(pypi): return a list from parse_requirements #2931
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The modeling of the data structures returned by the `parse_requirements` function was not optimal and this was because historically there was more logic in the `extension.bzl` and more things were decided there. With the recent refactors it is possible to have a harder to misuse data structure from the `parse_requirements`. For each `package` we will return a struct which will have a `srcs` field that will contain easy to consume values. With this in place we can do the fix that is outlined in the referenced issue. Work towards bazel-contrib#2648
rickeylev
approved these changes
May 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The modeling of the data structures returned by the
parse_requirementsfunction was not optimal and this was because historically there was
more logic in the
extension.bzland more things were decided there.With the recent refactors it is possible to have a harder to misuse data
structure from the
parse_requirements. For eachpackagewe willreturn a struct which will have a
srcsfield that will contain easy toconsume values.
With this in place we can do the fix that is outlined in the referenced
issue.
Work towards #2648