Clarify meaning of presence of container in spec#170
Merged
Conversation
…`container` Flow property, previously only stated in AppNote0006.
samdbmg
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2026
Member
samdbmg
left a comment
samdbmg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - good find @GeorginaShippey
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Details
Adds clarification to the spec on the meaning of the presence, or otherwise, of the
containerFlow property. This was previously only stated in AppNote006.Jira Issue (if relevant)
Jira URL:
Related PRs
Where appropriate. Indicate order to be merged.
Submitter PR Checks
(tick as appropriate)
Reviewer PR Checks
(tick as appropriate)
Info on PRs
The checks above are guidelines. They don't all have to be ticked, but they should all have been considered.