Add context-aware date adjustment functions

[lgfang]

Implement beancount-date-up and beancount-date-down to increment/decrement date components based on cursor position. When cursor is on the year, adjust by years; on month, adjust by months; on day, adjust by days. Includes proper handling of month boundaries and day overflow (e.g., Jan 31 to Feb 28/29).

Example configuration:

  (use-package beancount
    ;; ...
    :bind (
           (:map beancount-mode-map
                 ("C-c <down>" . beancount-date-down)
                 ("C-c <up>"   . beancount-date-up))
           (:repeat-map beancount-repeat-map
                        ("<down>" . beancount-date-down)
                        ("<up>"   . beancount-date-up))))

[blais]

Tests all fail; I haven't touched this in a while. Can you run the tests and make sure they still run?

…

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 11:48 PM Lungang Fang ***@***.***> wrote: Implement beancount-date-up and beancount-date-down to increment/decrement date components based on cursor position. When cursor is on the year, adjust by years; on month, adjust by months; on day, adjust by days. Includes proper handling of month boundaries and day overflow (e.g., Jan 31 to Feb 28/29). Example configuration: (use-package beancount ;; ... :bind ( (:map beancount-mode-map ("C-c <down>" . beancount-date-down) ("C-c <up>" . beancount-date-up)) (:repeat-map beancount-repeat-map ("<down>" . beancount-date-down) ("<up>" . beancount-date-up)))) ------------------------------ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #68 Commit Summary - 13c0daf <13c0daf> Add context-aware date adjustment functions File Changes (1 file <https://github.com/beancount/beancount-mode/pull/68/files>) - *M* beancount.el <https://github.com/beancount/beancount-mode/pull/68/files#diff-874bcac7101ecefa1ee83b6f83bb0c791bef82ce09ae427716778e23f681d9a2> (82) Patch Links: - https://github.com/beancount/beancount-mode/pull/68.patch - https://github.com/beancount/beancount-mode/pull/68.diff — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#68>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACSBE5IWABG67JGRBOQDE33ZBF2NAVCNFSM6AAAAACJ6ZAKO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZTGU2DGMBSGM2TGMI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lgfang]

@blais Thanks for checking this out. The failures are due to new options in bean-doctor 3.2.0, not changes in this PR. I've opened #69 to address the failures separately. Could you please merge that PR first? I'll rebase this one after.

[blais]

Merged both. Thank you!

…

On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 2:48 AM Lungang Fang ***@***.***> wrote: *lgfang* left a comment (beancount/beancount-mode#68) <#68 (comment)> @blais <https://github.com/blais> Thanks for checking this out. The failures are due to new options in bean-doctor 3.2.0, not changes in this PR. I've opened #69 <#69> to address the failures separately. Could you please merge that PR first? I'll rebase this one after. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#68 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACSBE4FTZCEV6XGCFZOOJT3ZRVEHAVCNFSM6AAAAACJ6ZAKO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTINBYGA3DOMBYGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>