Skip to content

Fix: correct struct field mapping in Jinja2Value (replace nfields with fieldnames)#8

Merged
gryumov merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
fix/custom-type-fieldmap
Oct 19, 2025
Merged

Fix: correct struct field mapping in Jinja2Value (replace nfields with fieldnames)#8
gryumov merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
fix/custom-type-fieldmap

Conversation

@gryumov
Copy link
Member

@gryumov gryumov commented Oct 17, 2025

Fix: correct struct field mapping in Jinja2Value (replace nfields with fieldnames)

Pull request checklist

  • Did you bump the project version?
  • Did you add a description to the Pull Request?
  • Did you add new tests?
  • Did you add reviewers?

Fix: correct struct field mapping in Jinja2Value (replace nfields with fieldnames)
@github-actions
Copy link

📘 A preview of the documentation will be here soon

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.81%. Comparing base (47d1c2c) to head (9b1539c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #8      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.88%   78.81%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         270      269       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          213      212       -1     
  Misses         57       57              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gryumov gryumov merged commit 657860a into master Oct 19, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@gryumov gryumov deleted the fix/custom-type-fieldmap branch October 19, 2025 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants