Skip to content

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator

@yarikoptic yarikoptic commented Sep 13, 2025

and also did not include under "raw" subfolder

attn @nikhil153 since relates to a bit more "involved" discussion/approach of

edit: continuing on above relation to #2191 -- this + 1 more spot is where might be worth changing "raw" into "bids-raw" or "raw-bids" (under sourcedata/) to signal that it is not just "raw" recording of some kind, but rather a raw BIDS dataset.

… is BIDS

and also did not include under "raw" subfolder
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.71%. Comparing base (73281ae) to head (3828d79).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2210   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.71%   82.71%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        1608     1608           
=======================================
  Hits         1330     1330           
  Misses        278      278           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@effigies effigies changed the title We were talking about "raw dataset" but did not make it clear that it BIDS ENH: Clarify that "raw dataset" source data in example layout is a raw BIDS dataset Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants