Skip to content

Conversation

@timtreis
Copy link
Collaborator

@timtreis timtreis commented Jun 5, 2023

No description provided.

@timtreis timtreis requested a review from arberqoku June 27, 2023 20:25
"z",
self.gp.pyro_model(self.covariate),
).view(-1, self.n_samples, self.n_factors, 1)
return sample
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we returning early here? We still need to sample the rest, no?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #74 (b40ccfe) into main (a5d7d39) will increase coverage by 6.07%.
The diff coverage is 85.35%.

❗ Current head b40ccfe differs from pull request most recent head d0fce8b. Consider uploading reports for the commit d0fce8b to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #74      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.73%   49.80%   +6.07%     
==========================================
  Files          16       17       +1     
  Lines        1452     1536      +84     
==========================================
+ Hits          635      765     +130     
+ Misses        817      771      -46     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
cellij/core/_factormodel.py 61.12% <71.64%> (+4.36%) ⬆️
cellij/core/models.py 70.96% <80.00%> (+2.78%) ⬆️
cellij/core/_pyro_guides.py 70.86% <94.44%> (+35.24%) ⬆️
cellij/core/_pyro_models.py 64.97% <97.72%> (+1.70%) ⬆️
cellij/core/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cellij/core/_gp.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants