[FIX] Naive Bayes: Ignore existing classes in Laplacian smoothing#3575
Merged
lanzagar merged 1 commit intobiolab:masterfrom Feb 15, 2019
Merged
Conversation
325575e to
6fcd7cf
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3575 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.97% 83.97% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 370 370
Lines 66944 66945 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 56213 56214 +1
Misses 10731 10731 |
6fcd7cf to
de273b1
Compare
de273b1 to
5e0fa06
Compare
Contributor
|
Looks good to me. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
As suggested by @lanzagar, issue #2943 can be fixed by ignoring empty classes in Laplacian smoothing.
Plainly, say that
yhas valuesmale,female,yesandnobecauseyappeared in two different data sets loaded in the same session. Of course, only two values appear in each set. With this PR, only 2 is added to denominators in computation of probabilities, and the probabilities of empty classes are set to 0.Variable reuse remains a large open issue.
Description of changes
The change also required a minor change in computation of probabilities: instead of computing
exp(log(class_probs) + sum(conditional_probs)), the code now computesclass_probs * exp(sum(conditional_probls))becauseclass_probscan now be 0. This should not affect numerical stability.Includes