[FIX] table_to_frame: metas lost on conversion#4259
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4259 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.77% 86.81% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 396 396
Lines 71550 71557 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 62089 62121 +32
+ Misses 9461 9436 -25 |
|
Thank you for the PR. Some comments:
|
|
Hi, Vesna.
In my personal opinion this parameter can cause confusion in further usage, i believe by default table supposed to be transformed into frame without any columns lost. The user always can drop some columns explicitly if he needs. There might be some incompatibility though in case somebody rely on output frame columns number (maybe in tests). Otherwise i guess additional (in comparison with prev. results) datarfame columns shouldnt provide any harm to existing code. |
|
All that is true and I agree with you, but still, the existing code should not be broken. |
Or a year. Better. |
|
Decision at the meeting: @VesnaT implements what she proposed here and merges the PR. |
13a7bf7 to
4a9a063
Compare
4a9a063 to
8b2a8f5
Compare
Issue
Description of changes
Includes