Bugfix: repair missing/broken Markdown reference-style links

Author: harding

_posts/en/meetings/2015-12-17-meeting.md

@@ -100,4 +100,5 @@ YYYYYYYEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
 ## Credits
 
 This summary was originally compiled by Stefan Gilis aka "G1lius" and posted to the [bitcoin-discuss mailing list][meetingsource] with the disclaimer, "Please bear in mind I'm not a developer so some things might be incorrect or plain wrong." and placed copyright in the Public Domain.
+
 [meetingsource]: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-discuss/2015-December/000039.html

_posts/en/meetings/2016-07-21-meeting.md

@@ -126,5 +126,6 @@ This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the disc
 [#7081]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7081
 [#8364]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8364
 [#8365]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8365
+[#8388]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8388
 
 {% include _references.md %}

_posts/en/meetings/2016-08-04-meeting.md

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ There's no clear cut solution for this.
 
 This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the discussion, so any errors are the fault of the summary author and not the discussion participants.
 
-[#8483]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8483
+[#8438]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438
 [#8365]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8365
 
 {% include _references.md %}

_posts/en/meetings/2016-12-01-meeting.md

@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the disc
 [#9188]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9188
 [#9239]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9239
 [#9252]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9252
+[#9253]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9253
 [#9143]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9143
 [#9256]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9256
 [#8723]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8723

_posts/en/meetings/2016-12-22-meeting.md

@@ -121,5 +121,6 @@ This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the disc
 [#9375]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9375
 [#7533]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7533
 [#9138]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9138
+[#8776]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8776
 
 {% include _references.md %}

_posts/en/meetings/2017-04-06-meeting.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Since a lot of developers where missing or not focussed on the meeting because o
 - Sipa has been working on things related to database/cache/flush/memory usage.
 - Morcos is coding and recoding fee estimation for months, but it's much more complicated and will be hard to review.
 - Sdaftuar has been working on CreateNewBlock, introducing a way to skip recently added transactions if the block income for doing so is below some theshold.
-- Jtimon worked on some refactoring PRs, like [#9494][], [#10119][] and [#101118][]
+- Jtimon worked on some refactoring PRs, like [#9494][], [#10119][] and [#10118][]
 
 ## High priority review
 

_posts/en/meetings/2017-05-11-meeting.md

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the disc
 
 [#9343]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9343
 [#10333]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10333
-[#8649]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8649
+[#8694]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8694
 [#10240]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10240
 [#9494]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9494
 [#10195]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10195

_posts/en/posts/2016-04-15-release-0-12-1.md

@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ type: posts
 layout: post
 share: true
 version: 1
+excerpt: >-
+  We are pleased to announce the release of Bitcoin Core 0.12.1.  This
+  maintenance update includes the first soft fork deployment utilising
+  version bits
 ---
 We are pleased to announce the release of Bitcoin Core 0.12.1. This maintenance update includes the first soft fork deployment utilising "[version bits][BIP9]" as part of the [capacity increases](/en/2015/12/23/capacity-increases-faq/) roadmap.
 

_releases/0.12.1.md

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ This specific backport pull-request can be viewed at
 [BIP9]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009.mediawiki
 [BIP68]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0068.mediawiki
 [BIP112]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki
+[BIP113]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0113.mediawiki
 
 BIP68 soft fork to enforce sequence locks for relative locktime
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

_releases/0.14.0.md

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ shows where each field has been moved to:
 `"blocks"`	   | `getblockchaininfo()["blocks"]`
 `"timeoffset"`	   | `getnetworkinfo()["timeoffset"]`
 `"connections"`	   | `getnetworkinfo()["connections"]`
-`"proxy"`	   | `getnetworkinfo()["networks"][0]["proxy"]`
+`"proxy"`	   | `getnetworkinfo()["networks"][0]["proxy"]` <!--skip-test-->
 `"difficulty"`	   | `getblockchaininfo()["difficulty"]`
 `"testnet"`	   | `getblockchaininfo()["chain"] == "test"`
 `"keypoololdest"`  | `getwalletinfo()["keypoololdest"]`
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ command without running the commands separately.
 The nested RPC commands use bracket syntax (i.e. `getwalletinfo()`) and can
 be nested (i.e. `getblock(getblockhash(1))`). Simple queries can be
 done with square brackets where object values are accessed with either an 
-array index or a non-quoted string (i.e. `listunspent()[0][txid]`). Both
+array index or a non-quoted string (i.e. `listunspent()[0][txid]`). <!--skip-test--> Both
 commas and spaces can be used to separate parameters in both the bracket syntax
 and normal RPC command syntax.